Total Pageviews

Monday, 5 January 2026

Results From The Bristol Fox Deaths and Bristol Badger Deaths Registers 2025

    

Results From The Bristol Fox Deaths and Bristol Badger Deaths Registers 2025

 

Compiled by Terry Hooper

British Fox Study (f 1976) and Bristol Badger Group (f 1994)


blacktowercg@hotail.com

 

With thanks to Sarah Mills and to those vets who have progressed beyond the “just foxes” attitude.  Also to Vale Wildlife Hospital who have helped treat and save the lives of foxes from Bristol.

 

Introduction.

 

2025 saw a record number of fox deaths within the City and County of Bristol with the greatest numbers killed by motor vehicles speeding and refusal by the City Council to tackle the problem.

 

When I started the British Fox Study I assumed that over the years more people would become interested in foxes and that citizens would become more active. We have feeders and also people who simply treat foxes and badgers as photo opportunities. The total lack of support from the large number of wildlife groups in the region has been very noticeable. There are, of course, individuals who will help out as and when they can and they deserve praise.

 

Just how many foxes may be dying onb Bristol roads we have tried to determine based on known statistical trends. Even though this is not a 100% accurate figure even if cut by 50% it is concerning and yet, for a City boasting of its environmental status and wildlife loving credentials, very few seem to care.  Each year the totals are released and other than one or two “Likes” the overwhelming trend is apathy and if wildlife groups are like this then  it is no surprise that species in the UK are in decline.

 

Sarah Mills, the Bristol Fox Lady, has worked tirelessly and has managed to treat and save so many foxes.

 

When you read the statistics just remember that this is one City and County and that fox death totals nation wide would be staggering. Badger deaths totals are just terrible to think about since the vast majority of deaths are based on bad science and political game playing.

 

Like the hedgehog, the badger and foxes are heading for extinction and the truth is that very few people care.

The 2025 Deaths Registers Analysis.

Despite pro hunt "conservation" groups and their often repeated claims in the press the fox population in the UK is far from "booming" and every night men and women go out to shoot anything they find with foxes  being popular. This is done simply for 'fun' because according to the law foxes can be killed only when threatening live stock and with no livestock within miles of where these people often congregate for their 'sport' there is no legitimacy to the constant killing.

When the total number of fox deaths is we cannot say. The attitude is that “If it’s dead why report it”  or people are just suffering self induced blindness to the dead animals they see.  It was decided that, based on the total number of deaths at the time, AI analysis would be used to attempt to find a total.

It was estimated that the actual number of fox road deaths based on the 360 reported incidents would likely be in the range of 4,320 to 5,760 deaths, as reported incidents represent a significant underestimate of the true figure.   Research indicates that a substantial discrepancy between reported and actual wildlife road casualties and studies are  suggesting that the actual death rate can be 12 to 16 times higher than the number of corpses counted, especially from a moving vehicle.

 

This discrepancy is due to various factors, including predator removal of carcasses, road type, traffic volume, time of day, and weather conditions.

 

Applying the 12-16 times multiplier to your reported number of 360 you find that:

 

Lower estimate: 360 reported deaths * 12 = 4,320 actual deaths

 

Upper estimate: 360 reported deaths * 16 = 5,760 actual deaths

 

Overall, the actual number is likely far higher than the number of publicly reported incidents, which often only capture a small fraction of total wildlife road mortality. To be honest those totals were slightly higher than I had estimated and even halving the totals it is still a staggering loss.

 

I then used AI to try to estimate the number of badger deaths covering all of the Badger Death Registers and the AI response was again shocking:

 

If you have 222 reported badger road deaths, the actual number is significantly higher, as most wildlife fatalities go unreported.  All estimates suggest tens of thousands of badgers die on UK roads yearly, so your 222 is a valuable sample for tracking trends but represents a tiny fraction, requiring extrapolation (like 10-20x) to guess total impact, though the Badger Trust uses such reports to estimate over 50,000 badgers annually.

 

If we multiply 222 by 10 then we have an estimate of  2,220.  Taking 222 and multiplying by 20 we have an estimated total of 4,440. Considering the personal communications with drivers, locals and others I would suggest that  2,220 is ‘acceptable’ but even halving that figure to 1,110 should concern anyone with an interest in  conservation and the environment.

When it comes to post mortem studies of dead badgers none of those reported underwent one. From the very outset I was told an outright lie both verbally and via email by the pathologist involved. I was told that no necropsy could be carried out due to Health and Safety Executive ruling based oin the ‘risk’ from Bovine TB. Only in very suspicious de4aths could a necropsy be carried out and that would need to be in the pathologists garden away from the pathology lab.

 

It has emerged since that while I was being told this badger necropsies (badger origins unknown) were being carried out at the lab and still are. For this reason every dead badger was assessed as killed by road traffic which seemed likely considering where they were found. The exception being a badger found at the bottom of a small cliff after severe weather.

 

That there is a burgeoning population of foxes is a lie and statistics released by pro hunt groups are meant to bolster that lie.  It was the same thing that Hunts did in the 1940s through to the 1960s and pro hunt 'naturalists' made it very clear (with a wink and chuckle)  that the figures were exaggerated. If you bear that in mind:

 

“An estimated 70,000 to 80,000 foxes are killed annually by gamgekeepers (a proxy for "UK shooters") in Britain, according to data from the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust (GWCT)” -which, it needs to be pointed out is a pro hunt organisation and thusly recognised as being hunt biased.

 

The total number of foxes killed by all forms of shooting (by gamekeepers and other individuals) is more difficult to quantify precisely. One older estimate suggested around 80,000 foxes were shot and retrieved each year, with a further 115,000 deaths unaccounted for.

 

The older estimate goes back to when hunts were desperate and being constantly challenged by locals as well as by politicians  and in the press in the 1950s-1960s and the quoted figures given are taken out of context and without explanation from my own work!

 

One might ask how you can take "a further 115,000 deaths unaccounted for" ?

 

How can you state 115,000 dead foxes are "unaccounted for"? Either you have reports of those 115,000 dead foxes or it is a clear pointer to someone doctoring the numbers to keep the killing of foxes as being needed.

 

The truth is that fox numbers declined throughout the 20th century due to hunting and in many parts of Wales there are no foxes -wildlife photographers travel from across Wales to Bristol just to photograph foxes and will tell you that "We rarely get to see foxes in Wales" -one reason probably being snaring adding to the numbers killed.

 

There is no precise current official figure for foxes killed by snares in the UK, but estimates suggest a significant number, with older data pointing to tens of thousands (e.g., 9,500+ in 1995, or up to 39,000 managed by gamekeepers with 25% trapped by snares, potentially 9,750 annually). More broadly, reports indicate potentially millions of animals caught annually, with some sources suggesting up to 1.7 million animals (including foxes) caught in snares across England and Wales, highlighting the significant scale, though exact fox numbers remain elusive.

 

Then we have rodenticide deaths that affect many species that prey on rodents:

Exposure Rates are High: Studies analyzing fox livers have consistently found high rates of anticoagulant rodenticide (AR) residues. One study from the late 1990s found that 46% of a sample of 100 foxes had been exposed to rodenticides, and ten had died directly from the poisoning. More recent research (2011-2022) shows that exposure rates to some specific second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs), such as brodifacoum, may have increased since the introduction of stewardship schemes, with 43% of foxes exposed.

 

Secondary Poisoning: Foxes are primarily affected by secondary poisoning, which occurs when they eat poisoned rodents (such as rats and mice). Direct poisoning of foxes is illegal in Britain.

 

Sentinel Species: Foxes are considered a "sentinel species," meaning their high exposure levels act as an indicator of the widespread presence of these toxins in the environment and the risk to other wildlife.

 

Difficulty in Quantification: Determining the exact number of deaths is challenging because many poisoned foxes die in the wild or are killed by other causes (e.g., road traffic accidents) that can mask the signs of internal bleeding from the poison. Wildlife rescue charities frequently report cases of poisoned foxes but formal, national statistics are not collected.

 

While a precise annual number is unavailable, the high exposure rates and frequent anecdotal reports from wildlife organisations suggest that rodenticides are a major ongoing cause of mortality for the UK fox population.

 

Leptospirosis also takes a high toll of younger foxes and adding in "natural disease deaths" such as septicemia, kidney failure, mastitis, parasites such as worms and mange mites, cancer and when the vixen is killed and no other fox is around to feed cubs (an "aunt" fox or even dog fox) starving to death comes into the death rate -called "mismothering".

 

Determination of Sex

 

Out of the 375 known deaths some 77 were vixens and we cannot count the unknown number of cubs that died due to the lactating vixen being killed. Those cub deaths are technically termed “Mismothering”.

 

Some 121 known deaths involved Dog foxes. The higher rate of death may be due to the dispersal season as is usually claimed.  However, the deaths seem to have been consistently high from January to December. Various factors may be involved and one is the male taking turns at hunting because despite popular myth a “brace” (pair) do often stick together and in many cases there are leashes (a group of foxes) using the same dens or that have adjacent dens.

 

One vixen was noted going out and returning six times and each time carrying a rat, In other cases both dog and vixen take turns in hunting and in some cases where there are other vixens present they act as “Aunts” looking after cubs while the mother goes out hunting or will even bring back food for the nursing fox.  In cases where vixens have died the dog fox has been observed attempting to feed young.

 

Foxes are also naturally curious and well known wanderers when it comes to dog foxes so whereas the vixen having found a safe area to den may take up residence there on a permanent basis (only moving if she feels there is a threat to young cubs –at which point foxes “carrying of a pet cat” stories emerge as the cubs are misidentified) dog foxes mated and not mated can travel around a large area.

 

 

Causes of Death.

 

There are territorial fights and these can lead to infections and untreated death as organs are affected.  Although missing pieces of ear and even the odd scar from a fight (rather as with domestic cats fighting each other) the large number of facial injuries seem consistent and in many cases not fight associated but due to being swiped/hit by cars.

 

Leptospirosis reared its head again this year and out of all the foxes examined since 2021 not a single case of ‘rampant’ (“in British foxes”) adenovirus has been found.  It seems highly likely that any adenovirus was localised but as is usual amongst rescues it was grasped at to explain all unusual fox deaths and bypass any need to submit foxes for post mortem.  This seems reinforced by what happened after the Bristol fox deaths study when rescues again started claiming that any ill foxes with jaundice had “rampant leptospirosis” –just because there is jaundice present does not mean it is leptospirosis but could be due to a number of problems such as infected wounds leading to organ failure.

 

Cancer is found rarely in wild foxes but it has been noted in the work carried out. There were a number of cases of “emaciated foxes” dying but due to these not being allowed to be submitted there is no way of telling whether this was due to disease or some other problem.

 

Mange is not a big killer, at least in Bristol now (we lost 96% of the fox population to it in 1994/1995) as once reported it can be treated thanks to Sarah Mills’ dedication to foxes.  Prior to her taking on Bristol foxes the local rescue had a policy of euthenazing any fox with mange as standard.  Deaths do still occur as people who have observed foxes losing hair to the point of baldness and getting progressively worse do not report them until it is too late. There is absolutely no reason for these deaths and they happen because of people who are either anti fox or simply do not care.

 

 

Vets Attitude Regarding Foxes

 

In Bristol the once anti fox stance by vets has vanished to a degree and we have seen vets listen and even go well beyond what would be expected including scans as part of their first treatment of wildlife duties. A good number of vets are now more friendly to foxes submitted and will even consult regarding sick foxes.

 

This is still a long way from the attitude that a leg injury of any kind means a fox needs to be killed –three legged foxes thrive in the wild and even raise cubs successfully.  Facial injuries we have shown can be successfully treated in the wild and it is good to see some rescues actually treating facial wounds albeit in foxes confined.

 

Another thing vets are learning is to not misjudge fox weights when treating or medicating. Vets often vastly over estimated fox weights basing them on pet dog standard weights. Weights should be looked at from a cat size perspective.

 

 

Determined Weight (kg) of Foxes

 

Where known we have ascertained the weight of dead foxes and it is now standard to have any submitted to vets weighed. .  For those foxes we do know the weights for 6 kgs is at the top level of weight and the 9 kgs is a rarity

 

 

Known Dog  Fox Weights

 

1.5                                 

1.7

2.0

2.2

2.2

3.0

3.2

3.2

3.3

3.4

3.5

3.5

3.9

3.9

4.0

4.0

4..0

4.2

4.2

4.2

4.2

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.82

4.9

4.9

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.1

5.2

5.3

5.3

5.4

5.5

5.5

5.5

5.5

5.7

5.7

5.9

5.9

5.9

5.9

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.1

6.2

6.2

6.2

6.4

6- 6.5

6.5

6.7

8.4

9.3

 

Known Vixen Weights

 

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.6

2.8

2.8

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.3

3.3

3.4

3.4

3.5

3.5

3.6

3.7

3.9

3.9

3.9

4.0

4.2

4.2

4.2

4.4

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.6

4.9

5.0

5.0

5.2

5.2

5.2

5.5

5.6

 

   NB: one fox at 4.5kg had “back end destroyed so cannot register as dog fox

 or vixen

 

And talking about badger deaths there are the results of the unscientific cull of badgers in just the Avon  (we went back to City and County of Bristol in 1995):

During the 2022 badger cull in the Avon area (Area 44), 1,162 badgers were removed by controlled shooting, exceeding the updated minimum target of 948 badgers, with similar intense culling continuing in other Avon zones as part of the government's strategy to control bovine TB in cattle.

I would estimate that the number of badgers killed each year on Bristol roads is far more likely to be around 150-200.

This cannot go on as we are losing the hedgehog, the fox and the badger in such numbers that like many other UK species they are heading for extinction by the 2030s.  

We have had extinctions before and the major extinction event was the 1860s when the wild cats, Old type British foxes, various deer, squirrels and other species were hunted despite it being widely written and commented on that they were going extinct.

Saturday, 16 August 2025

The Fourth Red Paper That Will NEVER Be Published

I mentioned at one point a fourth Red Paper. The 2010 Red Paper basically showed all of the research I was ready to publish in 2010. That counted as Volume 1 of the Canids work.

I published the Red Paper 2022 Vol. 1 -Canids and The Red Paper 2022 Vol. 2 -Felids. These were fully comprehensive and the totality of the research from 1976-2021.  The late Dr David Bellamy described the 2010 paper as "explosive" -I wonder what he would have said of the updates?

The technically 4th Red Paper would have been the Bristol Fox Deaths Study -looking at the results of post mortems on over 80 foxes that died in Bristol. It was the first study of its kind in the UK and this quote from a post explains why it will not be printed:



Bristol Foxes Study Looking At Causes of Mortality

  The finding and notes presented here are entirely my own and based on the conclusions of post mortems carried out on foxes from Bristol which I submitted as the "owner" of and I am therefore permitted to give out this information without hinderance. No material is quoted or copied from the post mortem reports themselves.

It may be that certain parties do not wish to educate veterinarians, wildlife rescuers and the public on fox health matters (for whatever undisclosed reason) but it has been my stated aim since the outset to educate and inform.

As  Langford is listed as an APHA Post Mortem Centre and it was where the APHA told me that dead foxes would need to be taken then they have a certain responsibility in this matter especially as they received some of the PM reports. Submission forms for each fox went to Bristol University Post Mortem Services (BUPMS)   for submitting to Langford Veterinary School (LVS) and where foxes were handled by LVS staff and therefore BUPMS and LVS are also responsible for what takes place on their premises and through their service -BUPMS received copies of the PM reports.

Both LVS/BUPMS and APHA were made fully aware of the actions taken to stop use of the post mortem reports; they were furnished with a copy of the draft report as well as all email communications on the matter which included the threats made against me and uncalled for and unprofessional actions taken against myself and my publishing company.

After more than a THREE weeks I have not heard from any of the parties involved and the natural assumption is that someone they employ (LVS) and use for post mortems (APHA and BUPMS) being allowed to threaten via email and take legal actions against my company over a draft copy of a paper that was NOT published is sanctioned by them.  These bodies have all received copies of the PM reports so have taken the data from the Project.  I, as the person who started the project am not allowed to quote or "use any part" of those reports. With no response from any of the parties involved but continued threats, I have to assume that it was never intended to allow me to use information from fox post mortems even though, legally as declared on the submission forms, I was listed as the "owner".

                                                     ---------

Months later there has still been no response and when I approached one of the bodies involved about a fox that had died and the vet thought trhat it might be suffering from a disease I was told (paraphrasing) “We are not going to accept anything you submit”. I have to admit that I am still stumped about what was going on and why within a few hours of receiving the draft paper the pathologist descended into abuse and even went after my publishing business which had nothing to do with the paper –it was NOT published. I am told that my name has been maligned by a certain person  twice since this hence my needing to make the situation clear.

Here is a copy of my desk book entry –made in front of the pathologist at Langford when we met up and all confirmed as we talked. Read back to him and receiving a “fine” from him.



There are still foxes being submitted but I am not permitted to know the results or the real reason why all of this happened. I just do not think that it was expected that I would produce a full report  but maybe a “fox lover mini paper” –I have no idea but considering everything was explained and updated as I went along I have to face the fact that none of those involved intended for a serious report to be  submitted and, though I HATE to write it; a cover up followed.

I can share PM results just not the ins and outs only what I was involved in. The Fourth Red Paper is therefore not going to appear.


Saturday, 8 June 2024

ALL Books Are Priced For Region and Printed and Posted in Region -NO International Shipping

 




To make it clear: 

1.  if you order a book from the online store it does not involve international shipping. Books are printed in your region -that's how print on demand works.  

2.  The price of the book should be shown in your own currency.

3.  Obviously your local postal rates apply and there are options for tracked, special delivery and untracked (the least expensive) postage from within your region.

Ordered in your region, printed in your region and delivered by the postal system in your region.  It could not be more simple.

One important thing to note is that third party sellers will state "post free" and that is a lie. You often pay 30-75% more on a book ordered through a third party seller than from the online store. The reason is because the third party seller HAS to buy from the online store and the selling price usually covers two postal payments -0from store to them and then to you.  

People have purchased from third party sellers and not gotten their books or have had to wait over a month for them to arrive. At that point they contact me and it is all very simple: they tried to rob me of a sale and bought a book at a far more expensive price because they read "post free". That is important because if you buy from a third party seller you are removing the small profit I make on a book. Also, ordering from the online store is not just cheaper but, even though it has never happened since I started selling in 2009,  I can actually look into why you have not had your book delivered. Third party seller -your tough luck.

Support the creator and publisher not third party scammers.



I have asked to clarify which countries books can be ordered from as I know someone in Hong Kong and China were interested and it looks like you can order from there. According to the  print company:

We do NOT ship to the following countries/territories:


  • Belarus

  • Region of Crimea

  • Cuba

  • Iran

  • Johnston Island

  • North Korea

  • Russia

  • Saint Pierre Et Miquelon

  • South Sudan

  • Sudan

  • Syria

  • Republic Of Turkmenistan

  • Ukraine

  • Wake Islands

  • Yemen Arab Republic

  • Venezuela

Hope that helps!

Friday, 20 January 2023

Red Papers' Release Dates

 



 At the moment The Red Papers (vols. I and II) I have set a publication date of 1st March for.

This will make sure that those I promised advanced copies to will get them and that is going to cost me more than I think the books will ever make (the new Introduced Species paper is far cheaper and has to date sold zero copies).

So more updates next month.

Wednesday, 21 September 2022

Is "Conversational Style" Writing Wrong -a look at The Red Paper 2022: Canids



According to the publisher who rejected the Red Paper 2022 Canids Ms:


"Greater use of sub-headings would be useful. It has quite a bit of a conversational style in places, which isn’t a failing, just perhaps not a fit for us. There are, perhaps inevitably given the sources, a lot of long quotes."


My actual concern was that I had used too many sub-headings!  "Conversational style" is something I have come across before. Sir David Attenborough has managed to engage so many people because he has a "conversational" style. The late Sir David Bellamy had a similar style. It is used by some who disapprove of explaining complex issues and matters so that Mr Smith in the street understands. It is something frowned up as academics have their own little club and publications that are treated exclusively as theirs -whether they are funded by public money or not. The "unwashed" must not have access and if a problem  needs explaining technical jargon is used because it makes the academic seem to be a genius as it means nothing to the public. 


I was once the target of scathing attacks online because I explained a complicated matter in a way people could understand. The purpose of science should be -was supposed to be- the education of humanity and not the hoarding of knowledge for their own little club.


"Conversational style" I take as a compliment. I want to educate and inform not leave people thinking "He is an absolute genius -I never understood a word he said!"


The headings and why I used (obviously not enough) so many is explainable when you look at what is in the book.


A brief synopsis


When the Doggerland bridge flooded the British Isles became separated from

Continental Europe and its wildlife developed uniquely. The British Isles, for the purpose of this work includes Ireland, and isolated the wolves on both became what would be island species not affected by the usual island dwarfism. These wolves, after millennia became “unwanted” and forests and woodland was burnt down or cut down for the specific purpose of lupicide; the killing of every and any wolf –and there was a bounty for “a job well done”. The Ms looks at the history of the wolves, their persecution and what they might have looked at as well as how hunting ravaged the established eco system.


At the same time there also developed three unique island species of Old fox from the coyote-like Mountain or Greyhound fox (historical taxidermy compared to a coyote shows that the British fox was larger), the slightly smaller but robustly built Mastiff or Bulldog fox and the smaller Common or Cur fox –the latter like today’s red foxes had a symbiotic relationship with humans.


These canids were mainly ignored until it was decided that they could provide fur and meat and those things earn money. From that point onward, especially after all other game had been killed off, the fox (previously considered beneath the true huntsman to be bothered with) faced what writers over the centuries referred to as “vulpicide” –extermination through bounties paid, trapping or hunting simply for being a fox and reviled for sheep and poultry stealing that even hunters stated they were not doing in many cases (foxes killing and carrying off a full grown sheep was deemed impossible and a bounty set up in the 1800s to prove foxes did this is still unclaimed).


Hunters knew that they were hunting the “Old types” of fox to extinction and despite all the famous hunter-naturalist writers noting that the Old foxes were nearing extinction the hunts continued until by the late 1880s the Old were gone and replaced by the New –foxes imported by the thousands every year for the ‘sport’ of fox hunting and this importation also led the the UK seeing the appearance of mange (unknown before the importations).


The travelling British sportsmen, going on hunting holidays to the United States, and Europe, went hunting coyote, wolf and jackals, the latter something enjoyed by the Old Colonials. Many on returning to England wanted to bring a taste of of the chase and excitement of a much larger and cunning canid able to afford a longer chase (the most important aspect of the hunt) to “the good old country”. Wolves, jackals and coyotes were set up in hunting territories from where they could learn the lay of the land and provide good sport later. Some hunts even attempted to cross-breed foxes, jackals and Coyotes. And we have the taxidermy proof assessed by independent experts.


A great many taxidermy photographs (none seen in print before) from the 1800s up to the 1930s show what sellers who have no idea describe as “fox masks” (heads). Some of these I have sought expert opinions on and have been clearly identified as coyote and wolf while other are jackals. The importation and press coverage of the period of jackal and wolf hunts explains why so many incidents (again reported in the press) of jackals and wolves as well as coyotes are known for the 19th to 20th centuries -and we have the evidence.


Then there were the legendary –almost mythical– beasts; “The black beast of Edale”, “The killer canids of Cavan” and the “girt (great) dog of Ennerdale”. The press reports from the times as well as what we know today are used to show just what these animals were and in some cases solve the mysteries. The “wild dogs” and the number that lived in the British countryside are an aspect of canid history not looked at before and these wild living animals may have been the animals that were to blame for sheep killings rather than foxes.


In more recent times raccoon dogs and arctic foxes have appeared in the UK; some released for ‘sport’ (as with the arctic fox going back to the 1880s) while others are exotic escapees long since established in the countryside.


By admissions of hunts themselves (past and even present) this was all about fun and sport and nothing to do with “pest control”.


The Ms looks at the social history as well as the way in which humans have affected the eco system starting in the 1700s and the impact is still being felt today and, importantly, how we can and must behave to prevent further extinctions and protect past history for generations to come.


Fully referenced and containing maps and previously unseen photographs whether a layman interested in wildlife, a naturalist or zoologist this book is one you must read. This book re-writes British natural history.


Word count for Red Paper 2022 is 120, 827....that's a lot of typing...and when you consider the edits and re-edits I'd say the Ms has totalled up 130,00 words.


As for the various topics:


The Girt Dog of Ennerdale & Others 

The Girt Dog of Ennerdale -Hyena, Jackal or Other? 

Successors to the Girt Dog of Ennerdale 

Black Beast of Edale 

The Scottish Wolfdog or Wolfdogs 

Achill Wolves 

Foxes

A Very Brief History of fox Hunting 

How Many Foxes Are There And Are They A Threat? 

More On Fox Mortality 

The Great Scarcity and Early human Habituation? 

Old British foxes 

Anomalies In Foxes 

The New Fox Look 

Fox Addendum 

Arctic Foxes 

Raccoon Dogs 

Fox and Dog Hybrids 

Jackals 

The Killer Canids of Cavan 

The Vampire Sheep Killer 

The Dog-Fox Hybrid 

The Sevenoaks Jackal 

The Sandbach Jackal(s) 

Wolves (a History of British Wolves) 

The Dionard Wolf 

Wolves of France 

Showmen, Menageries & Wolves 

The Wolves of Peckham, South Shields and Essex 

Mysterious Depradator” & Others 

The Hexham/Allendale Wolf 

Wolves in Ireland and Other Escapes 

Prairie Wolf/Coyote 

Conclusions and Comments 

Maps & Notes 

Diseases and Illnesses 


No one has ever covered the subject of canids in the UK and the island of Ireland in such detail and gathering information from as many sources as possible -historical books and papers by naturalists, zoologists and even hunters going back as far as possible. With the invaluable help of my colleague, LM, it was possible to gather examples of the Old type of canids that the book looks at. 


The deforestation is looked at as it was the most important destruction of the environment; forests and woodland destroyed -cut down or burnt simply to get to wolves. Wolves that were not even causing problems (though some had to be left for local lords to have their hunts) and we look at the evidence of what wolves in the British Isles looked like once Ireland became separated from mainland Britain the wolves there became another unique subspecies. I take a look at what remains there are of our old wolves and the various accounts of “the ‘last’ wolf killed”.


When boar and wolves were made extinct so attention turned to the Old foxes three variants (NOT three different species). What we see today are not the native fox of old but new, introduced species that were imported by the thousands each year from at least the 17th century on as the native foxes died out -as noted and recorded in documents of the time. The history of foxes is looked at and how they fit into the eco system and also how they were persecuted even if they were nowhere near human habitation.



Old foxes; greyhound foxes were bigger, fiercer and wilder looking and may have had the same habits as coyotes -having a territory it covered from mountain, hills, forests as well as marshes. Very likely the greyhound/hill foxes the same and were more widespread -though it is noted some hill foxes were sent to other hunts in England as fox number declined again. Whether the descendents of these were the Devon and Cornwall hill foxes we have no idea but as the mountain fox was said to inhabit higher ground and only moving down in bad winters to find food. The Ms, using rare taxidermy, compares the old Greyhound fox with a coyote and the fox is much larger than the coyote.


White foxes and other colour variations existed and this, again, is prove with photographic evidence as is the question of some foxes having ringed tails. The practice of creating artificial dens for foxes on estates is looked at basically to raise foxes for hunts. This practice was also used to raise wolves, jackals and coyotes for hunts matter-of-factly reported in the press and hunting books at the time. The 1840s up to 1930s saw a number of publicised wolf appearances “out of nowhere” and this book solves what was never a “mystery”.


A look is taken at the jackal and coyote and how each had similarities to the Old fox and why they were chosen for hunting. The jackal was probably the most fox-like when it came to living alongside humans. The attempted breeding of fox-jackal hybrids as well as other crosses for hunting is also detailed.


Wild dogs (domestic dogs gone feral) in the UK is also looked at as it was for a very long period a big problem with some even living in packs. The Great Dog of Ennerdale was far from being a mystery beast and it’s activities and eventual death are detailed using archive sources. There were other wild dogs and some matched the Great Dog in local legend.


This is just some - a tiny fragment – of what the Ms contains and adding the unique maps and photographs never seen in print before it was designed to educate professional and amateur on the subject matter and be the definitive book on wild canids in the UK and once and for all push out the inaccurate dogma passed down from one generation to the next to0 a point that modern zoologists have no idea that there were three types of fox in the UK and certainly no museum (definitely not the Natural History Museum in London) has such a large collection of Old type foxes as the one owned by LM.


All of the above applies to the Red Paper 2022: Felids Ms which again destroys dogma and presents unique evidence and reveals for the first time what the original British wild cat looked like and irrefutable evidence that the true Scottish wild cat died out and was declared extinct by Scottish zoologists in 1897.


Quotes are necessary in both works because it is not professional to take a few words or a short paragraph out of original sources that puts it into perspective. I consulted books from the 18th century and throughout the 19th and 20th centuries and archives for pre 19th century evidence. The quotations are there because it is not likely that anyone other than a person with a grea\t deal of money will be able to get a hold of those sources and, again, I have spent since 1976 studying wild canids and foxes and dome of the quotes are from unpublished sources.


Long winded but I think it needed explaining. Whether the Canid or Felid Ms both are unique research never before carried out or published and are the basis for future research and study by others.






Results From The Bristol Fox Deaths and Bristol Badger Deaths Registers 2025

     Results From The  Bristol  Fox Deaths and  Bristol  Badger Deaths Registers 2025   Compiled by Terry Hooper British Fox Study (f 1976) ...